From owner-freebsd-small Fri Jul 28 15:14:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FF637B82B for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:14:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA43499; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:14:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA60182; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:14:32 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007282214.QAA60182@harmony.village.org> To: "Albert Yang" Subject: Re: Structure? Cc: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:06:17 PDT." <39819359.5807.123A2B0@localhost> References: <39819359.5807.123A2B0@localhost> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:14:32 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <39819359.5807.123A2B0@localhost> "Albert Yang" writes: : OK guys, I was thinking we should throw together an agreed upon : structure for Pico? I was thinking we'd do like FreeBSD, have a : stable and a current; with maybe 4 releases to the stable tree every : year, or whenever we feel that a release is stable. The version numbers are a stupid idea. Warenr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message