Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 16:46:29 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.ORG>, Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.ORG>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r221972 - head/sys/geom/part Message-ID: <3671.1306082789@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 May 2011 10:32:19 CST." <38A0D352-30A8-47A0-8259-12B3B216401B@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <38A0D352-30A8-47A0-8259-12B3B216401B@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh write s: >After carefully reviewing this code, we need to have it be *OFF* by >default. It should also explain *WHY* it is rejecting the partition. >It isn't clear to me at all that this is even useful. Seconded * 3. My experience so far is that 1 out of in 7 USB flash devices worked with these paranoid checks enabled. What happened to the Robustness Principle ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3671.1306082789>