Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:50:02 -0700
From:      Skylar Thompson <skylar@cs.earlham.edu>
To:        Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
Cc:        Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCSI vs. SATA (was Re: Upgrading our mail server)
Message-ID:  <4509A45A.9060409@cs.earlham.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20060914114608.e130c6a0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
References:  <45096C88.4030203@esiee.fr>	<20060914111843.91BC.GERARD@seibercom.net>	<4509768C.5030602@esiee.fr> <20060914114608.e130c6a0.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigCE4EC8392A7BCE2A3A3FB846
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that pla=
gued
> ATA?  Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
>
> Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
> seems as if:
> a) The performance is still better
> b) The reliability is still better
>
> But I haven't taken a comprehensive look at the SATA offerings.  It als=
o
> seems as if SATA is more limiting.  Most SCSI cards can support 16
> devices, does SATA have similar offerings?  I know it's not common, but=

> if you need that many spindles, you need them!
I've used 15-drive SATA Promise arrays with some success. They come in
both Fibre Channel and SCSI varieties, and are about $10k with 400GB
SATA drives. I've run them up to ~170MB/s with RAID-5, which is more
than enough for me. You get the best of both the SATA and SCSI/FC worlds.=


--=20
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu)
-- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/



--------------enigCE4EC8392A7BCE2A3A3FB846
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (SunOS)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFCaRasc4yyULgN4YRAmgMAJ9+Ks2juSADrUFtu1uaPDj1P18rzgCfebkE
lFj6ZSPLOuNDrtPdbOQQC+I=
=Eigo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigCE4EC8392A7BCE2A3A3FB846--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4509A45A.9060409>