From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 30 11:41:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AFF106566C for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from sorbesgroup.com (mail.sorbesgroup.com [217.159.241.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6F78FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:41:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB353C51F88 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from sorbesgroup.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sorbesgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21324-01 for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:00 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (andrei [192.168.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7DD3C51F6A for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:00 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <49D0AFFC.2090306@bsd.ee> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:41:48 +0300 From: Andrei Kolu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable References: <49CA3795.609@bsd.ee> <49CA4498.2020007@bsd.ee> <49CA837D.3040202@barryp.org> <9bbcef730903251301u5ca861f5vcbe7622630cb180e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730903251301u5ca861f5vcbe7622630cb180e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost Subject: Re: 32bit filesystem limitations X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:41:50 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/3/25 Barry Pederson : > > >> Is there any reason not to skip labeling/partitioning and use da1 directly? >> Just newfs it and mount it. I've done this with a couple large Areca >> arrays with no ill effect so far. >> > > Nope, no practical reason. Skip the partitioning if you don't need it. > > Finally: # newfs /dev/da1 a# df -H Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on ..... /dev/da1 3.4T 4.1k 3.1T 0% /data ..... Mission accomplished. But why sysinstall plays such an ugly game? This problem should be announced as a bug.