From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 09:20:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6421065672 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D93F8FC14 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p759K8aP081689 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:20:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p759K8Fs081688; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:20:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:20:08 GMT Message-Id: <201108050920.p759K8Fs081688@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org From: Borja Marcos Cc: Subject: Re: kern/157728: [zfs] zfs (v28) incremental receive may leave behind temporary clones X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Borja Marcos List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:20:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/157728; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Borja Marcos To: Martin Matuska Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/157728: [zfs] zfs (v28) incremental receive may leave behind temporary clones Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:15:07 +0200 =09 On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Martin Matuska wrote: > If you remove that code, it will still work the way it should, but = slower :) > I still see no problem in not-prefetching hidden datasets. Yep, the patch seems to work perfectly. I've been trying to trigger the = issue and no way, seems to be solved. Borja.