From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar  6 21:15:02 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8AE16A420
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Mar 2006 21:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1AF43D8B
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon,  6 Mar 2006 21:14:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz)
Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz)
	(8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k26LEl9H094599
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:14:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from xdivac02@localhost)
	by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k26LElw0094598;
	Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:14:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:14:47 +0100
From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Message-ID: <20060306211447.GA93464@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References: <20060304173917.X61086@fledge.watson.org>
	<20060304180131.69997.qmail@web32709.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<20060305084713.GA97196@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
	<20060306102921.GC21025@tara.freenix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060306102921.GC21025@tara.freenix.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:15:03 -0000

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:29:21AM +0100, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Divacky Roman:
> > I do agree that cvs has its drawbacks but there is OpenCVS (cvs
> > reimplementation by openbsd folks) which seems to be actively maintained and
> > its authors promised things like atomic commits etc.
> 
> When ?  Just having atomic commits is not enough.  If you take the HEAD of
> cvs right now (1.12.*), you get a "commit id" generated for all commits.
> 
> > I think that switch from gnu cvs to opencvs is painless and should be done
> > (once the opencvs is in usable state) because
> 
> VCS migration is too heavy to switch to just CVS+epsilon.

opencvs and gnucvs uses exactly the same data format so you can use either tool
to access the repo. so the switch is painless.. I think its similar to
switching from gnu tar to bsdtar..

roman