From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 18 22:24:41 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F60916A46E
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from h.skuhra@gmail.com)
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F276613C45D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:24:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from h.skuhra@gmail.com)
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so276162nfb
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=+5dvSdXR6UCDGKQPg1EV+tZ5KYFGMgkBEsRoysnfB3Q=;
	b=I/WpasRTWSaKXLVjEdSMqOfP89I6HfZdb+lBO4e6oltX1AG6bbr/0j9pJIbcQCxNs/mig+umww/LEe/Y/PPi8K5JhsHMQDamJO/xPdjy0BfYlGQS39h20C7ELfCgDtMIJjmbxVmFD9RBA9FQ2GQFpTf4P4iIg2Nvj+AJqMttmCE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
	h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	b=SLZ889mRRH8JEti2lzJ8JLZPGDITgT7Vx6xmeBg0qq0tTLvRexIQLj2sb1OeiIuji7rnXH8OGK8hWXyv95v2x3JOHIgfI3jsLvtGAlH3IvlSRsJ5FIUWwARkejkCYovfFk5XZBUD5MW4o/joGnsgT7YufoBobevfC2YG63IIfe4=
Received: by 10.86.73.17 with SMTP id v17mr800911fga.1192744704928;
	Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oslo.ath.cx ( [213.47.80.26])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v23sm2508205fkd.2007.10.18.14.58.22
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:58:38 +0200
From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <h.skuhra@gmail.com>
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20071018215838.GA67603@oslo.ath.cx>
References: <7fec743f0710181221w258eef04n8ad01bf1f42d9152@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7fec743f0710181221w258eef04n8ad01bf1f42d9152@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: db41, db42 and db43 are they all needed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:24:41 -0000

Tankko <tankko@gmail.com> skrev:
> After installing 6.2 and all the ports I use on a new machine, I have:
>
> apr-db42-1.2.8_2
> db41-4.1.25_4
> db42-4.2.52_5
>
> and there is db43 out there as well, probably just waiting to be installed.
>
> db41-4.1.25_4 is used by:
> portupgrade-2.3.1,2
> ruby18-bdb-0.6.2
>
> db42-4.2.52_5 is used by:
> apr-db42-1.2.8_2
>
> Which is required by subverson (I need BDB access in subversion).
>
> Do I need all these different version of db?   I guess there is no
> huge downside to having them all installed, but it doesn't seem clean
> to my anal-retentive nature.
>
> Is there a make.conf flag that will just make them all use db42 (or
> db43)?  Is that wise?

Hi,

I have put "WITH_BDB_VER=45" to /etc/make.conf.

% pkg_info -R db45-4.5.20.0 
Information for db45-4.5.20.0:

Required by:
apr-gdbm-db45-1.2.8_2
mutt-devel-1.5.16_3
portupgrade-devel-2.3.1
ruby18-bdb45-0.6.2
subversion-1.4.4_1

- Herbert