Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 15:53:28 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Implementing C99's roundf(), round(), and roundl() Message-ID: <20031130235328.GA44393@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031130213951.GA37082@VARK.homeunix.com> References: <20031129000133.GA30662@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20031129080911.GA25448@VARK.homeunix.com> <20031129163105.GA32651@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20031130213951.GA37082@VARK.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:39:51PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > As a side comment, we need to start coding the missing C99 math(3) > > functions because GCC is moving to using these in their CVS > > development trees. > > Really? Which ones? I don't think I'll have time to deal with > this until January, but then again, we're not doing another gcc > import before then. The tree-ssa branch of GCC contains the new front end for Fortran 95. The runtime library uses round[f](), which is why I wrote the C implementation I submitted. The tree-ssa branch is slated to become gcc-3.5. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031130235328.GA44393>