From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Jul 30 12:37:01 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA27876
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scanner.worldgate.com (scanner.worldgate.com [198.161.84.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA27857
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from znep.com (uucp@localhost)
	by scanner.worldgate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id NAA26520;
	Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:36:37 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (marcs@localhost) by alive.znep.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA21129; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:38:02 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:38:02 -0600 (MDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Adam David <adam@veda.is>
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz is out
In-Reply-To: <199707301828.SAA08049@ubiq.veda.is>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970730133540.19785K-100000@alive.znep.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Adam David wrote:

> >I found out, that there are new apache SSLeay patches out.
> 
> >FTP Directory: ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/SSL/ 
> 
> >   README . . . . . . . . . . . . .  [May 29 15:58]      6k
> >   README.066 . . . . . . . . . . .  [May 29 15:59]      2k
> >   README.080 . . . . . . . . . . .  [Jul  1 12:44]      5k
> >   SSLeay-0.6.6.patch1. . . . . . .  [May 29 17:15]      1k
> >   SSLeay-0.6.6.tar.gz. . . . . . .  [May 29 17:15]    814k
> >   SSLeay-0.8.0.README. . . . . . .  [Jul  1 12:44]      1k
> >   SSLeay-0.8.0.tar.gz. . . . . . .  [Jul  3 15:12]    968k
> >   apache_1.1.1+1.3.ssl.tar.gz. . .  [Jul 16  1996]     21k
> >   apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz. . .  [Jul  7 09:56]     24k
> >   apache_1.2b10+ssl_1.6.tar.gz . .  [May  3 21:41]     22k
> 
> >Do you plan to upgrade the apache port with that changes 
> >so that a secure server would be made possible ?
> 
> And does this mean SSLeay-0.8 is needed as a separate port from -0.6.6 ?
> (i.e. does anything worthwhile depend on the previous version, either within
> the ports tree or outside of it?)

You can use 1.2.0+ssl_1.8 with SSLeay-0.6.6 if you really want, but it is
probably better to go for 0.8.1.  There may well be problems upgrading it;
short term it may be better to add a seperate port for 0.8.1.

Note that 1.2.0+ssl_1.8 doesn't apply cleanly against 1.2.1 (or 1.2.2 when
it comes out), but it is pretty easy to patch in the other parts by hand.