From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 23 9:41:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D35914E66 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9FC311C19; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4FC3826; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:42:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Wilko Bulte Cc: FreeBSD hackers list Subject: Re: building -STABLE release In-Reply-To: <199908231310.PAA48131@yedi.iaf.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote: > What would be the right releasetag to use in order to build > a 3.2-STABLE 'release' (make release)? Would that be RELENG_3 ? Yes. Though RELENG_3 is a branch tag. > RELENG_3_2_PAO: 1.222.2.4.0.2 > RELENG_3_2_PAO_BP: 1.222.2.4 > RELENG_3_2_0_RELEASE: 1.222.2.4 > RELENG_3_1_0_RELEASE: 1.222.2.1 > RELENG_3: 1.222.0.2 > RELENG_3_BP: 1.222 > > PAO is laptop stuff, BP == ???, RELEASE is obvious. Leaves RELENG_3 I think BP = branchpoint. Look at RELENG_3_BP, it's 1.222, that's when it was split. Look at RELENG_3, it's 1.222.0.2, which would be the second revision of that file since it was branched, I think. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message