From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 17:51:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8336816A41F; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:51:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374FD43D48; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:51:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BD1427DD; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:51:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:51:06 -0500 To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20050929175106.GA24423@soaustin.net> References: <200509291337.j8TDbiAb025573@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509291337.j8TDbiAb025573@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/lplayer/files patch-src_lpformsearchbase.ui ports/cad/qfsm/files patch-src_SimulatorDlg.ui ports/deskutils/tuxcards/files patch-src_gui_dialogs_optionsDialog-IOptionsDialog.ui ports/devel/esvn/files patch-.ui-frm_main.ui ports/devel/lincvs/files patch-src-AnnotateDialog.ui patch-src-CheckoutDialog.ui patch-src-LogDialog.ui ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:51:07 -0000 On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:37:44PM +0000, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Fix bogus ui files in preparation for Qt 3.3.5 As a reminder, we are _still_ in a ports slush, which means no sweeping changes while we wait for the release. Based on the number of packages affected by this change, it would at least meet my own definition, because it would be very difficult to roll a (possible-unrelated) security update back into one of these ports. mcl