From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 18 12:31:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4812016A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C055B43D1D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201])
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2IKVtul061634;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i2IKVtlb061132;	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: (from marcel@localhost)
	by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2IKVtwX061131;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:31:54 -0800
From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Message-ID: <20040318203154.GB61108@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
References: <40594A35.6060303@exeter.ac.uk>
	<20040318165003.GA60545@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<p06020430bc7f9dd937ac@[128.113.24.47]>
	<20040318193824.GB61300@ns1.xcllnt.net>
	<p06020435bc7fae711b74@[128.113.24.47]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06020435bc7fae711b74@[128.113.24.47]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Daniel Bond <D.M.Bond@exeter.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Updating sparc64 time_t, hostname not found
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:31:57 -0000

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:56:28PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> >...what a minute the make that is being used is the one built from
> >src/Makefile as the result of the existing make being to old. But
> >that one doesn't use a 64-bit time_t. We need to pick up the make(1)
> >from under /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bin/make...
> >
> >Does that sound plausible?
> 
> If he is using the 'installworld_newk' script, then that script
> builds a list of 64-bTT binaries in /tmp/install-newk.XXX, and
> uses those binaries for 'make installworld'.  That list of 64-bTT
> programs will include 'make'.

Yes, but if I'm not mistaken, src/Makefile will always use
/usr/obj/usr/src/make.${ARCH} if it's there:

\begin{reformatted snippet from src/Makefile}
MAKEPATH=       ${MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX}${.CURDIR}/make.${MACHINE}
BINMAKE= \
        `if [ -x ${MAKEPATH}/make ]; then \
	     echo ${MAKEPATH}/make;
	 else \
	     echo ${MAKE}; fi` \
        -m ${.CURDIR}/share/mk
_MAKE=  PATH=${PATH} ${BINMAKE} -f Makefile.inc1
\end{reformatted snippet from src/Makefile}

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net