Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 06:17:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 278045] [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client Message-ID: <bug-278045-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D278045 Bug ID: 278045 Summary: [NEW PORT] Simple command-line CalDav client Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: freebsd.org@fydagy.netizen.se Created attachment 249573 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D249573&action= =3Dedit New port: Simple command-line CalDav client This is my first attempt at submitting a port to FreeBSD, so please correct= me as appropriate. I did post a link to this commit on #freebsd-python a week = or two ago, which hopefully ironed out the worst mistakes. To the best of my knowledge, this calendar-cli is the most usable command l= ine tool around for querying CalDAV servers. At least it is the only one I've f= ound which is useful to me. I've been relying on it daily for a few years and contributed a few minor patches. I think it deserves to be easily discovera= ble for everyone and installable without needing to dance around with venv and = pip. According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy#PKGNAMEPREFIX > Ports MUST use PKGNAMEPREFIX, unless there is a compelling case not to. This tool being an end-user application is hopefully a compelling reason to skip the prefix. A typical user couldn't care less what its implementation language is, or which version of python that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-278045-7788>