From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 12 09:00:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06D8108CA4E for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (mail-40132.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.protonmail.ch", Issuer "QuoVadis Global SSL ICA G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77EC87982F for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:00:03 +0000 To: FreeBSD Ports From: Lorenzo Salvadore Reply-To: Lorenzo Salvadore Subject: Re: how to enforce one version of python Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20180911145151.zgyeaiobnvkuo2rg@ivaldir.net> <4cd79546-c301-4ab7-13eb-3233736953f5@yandex.ru> Feedback-ID: X6az_D2smWSR8MT5MHqXnWF0upxehDyHia7Id1cbayHNBUkRu3CIeusDsZHiivIIjmaKB1_OofpALrRUYjNz3w==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.protonmail.ch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:00:15 -0000 > Maybe I need to stop using portupgrade. What is the best replacement? I never liked traditional updaters: to me, they seem too complex for a task= that should be rather simple. Thus I wrote one myself: Caronte. It has not yet been committed to the port tree, but you can find the port here, waiting for a commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230769 Keep in mind that the project is new and I have not tested it in many situation yet. In particular, I found that I need to work a bit in the case new options are added to a port after an update (at the moment, in this case, the upgrade is suspended in the configuration step of the updated port until you press CTRL + C), but I will fix that as soon as possible (it was not a priority until I was the only user). I think my updater has a nice behavior with flavors (read manpage), but if it has not, you can post an issue on github and I will deal with it as a priority: https://github.com/lsalvadore/caronte Lorenzo Salvadore.