Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:05:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? Message-ID: <1342998350089-5729042.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK3qWnh_MUfBAEzTexsJdXu4JP5nPG=z4jJdUUd2qwSUxQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <CA%2BtpaK3qWnh_MUfBAEzTexsJdXu4JP5nPG=z4jJdUUd2qwSUxQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Speaking of misunderstanding, that's certainly possible. How much overhead is "normal" and alternatively, why in FreeBSD USB 2.0 reports as "40MB/s" and not other arbitrary number. I hope I didn't sound like "PLEASE HELP I WANT USB 3.0 SPEEDS ON USB 2.0"... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729042.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1342998350089-5729042.post>