From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jun 7 2:48: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B463314C96 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA30442; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 11:46:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: John Baldwin Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Wes Peters , Mike Nowlin Subject: Re: NIS strangeness References: <199906070227.WAA16969@smtp1.erols.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 07 Jun 1999 11:46:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: John Baldwin's message of "Sun, 06 Jun 1999 22:27:52 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Baldwin writes: > If it was in /etc/master.passwd, yes. In /etc/passwd, no. At least, I run a > lab of 80+ machines running NIS over FreeBSD and Digital Unix and all the > FreeBSD clients have +:::::::: in /etc/master.passwd and +:*::::::: in > /etc/passwd. /etc/passwd is a dummy. It isn't used for anything. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message