Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:57:42 -0500 From: Alan Eldridge <alane@geeksrus.net> To: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: CUPS support can be unconditional [signing off of this one] Message-ID: <20020111195742.GA45830@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20020111144245.T80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20020111193232.GA45614@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <20020111144245.T80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:45:23PM -0500, Joe Clarke wrote: >I think it makes things even more confusing since CUPS printing will not >work with just cups-base. And, when you compile with CUPS printing, Samba >tries to enable it by default. Therefore, without cups-lpr, printing will >be broken in CUPS by default if you just include cups-base...and do so >unconditionally. Does anybody start Samba and just expect it to work with no configuration? If you can print, by default, via samba and regular lpr, without ever once running SWAT or editing smb.conf, then you've got a point, And a very insecure samba installation by default. We'll just have to disagree on this. It's dwcjr@'s call. Samba and kdelibs are the only ports that have the cups issue. I'm not likely to budge from my position, and I doubt I can sway you from yours. -- Alan Eldridge Pmmfmffmmfmp mmmpppppffmpmfpmpppff PmpMpmMpp ppfppp MpfpffmppmppMmpFmmMpm mfpmmmmmfpmpmpppff. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020111195742.GA45830>