From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 18:56:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B53106564A; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E9A8FC0C; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter-phk.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6CD13E71; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JIu51R015188; Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:06 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Warner Losh From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 May 2012 12:50:24 CST." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:05 +0000 Message-ID: <15187.1337453765@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Konstantin Belousov , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Millan Subject: Re: headers that use "struct bintime" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:08 -0000 In message , Warner Losh write s: >> I think at this time, we can either religiously stick to POSIX >> and become irellevant with it, or we can develop our APIs to >> become useful and desirable, and have a chance to survive. > >Doesn't __BSD_VISIBLE do just that? That was not my impression, but I may be wrong on that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.