From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon May 11 21:27:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89E82ED5C0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per@hedeland.org) Received: from mailout.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [64.68.202.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49LYtl5dGJz4DKT for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per@hedeland.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66076C0A8A; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout.easydns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo12-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqxvDN28RIlJ; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hedeland.org (81-228-157-209-no289.tbcn.telia.com [81.228.157.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 443B3C0942; Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pluto.hedeland.org (pluto.hedeland.org [10.1.1.5]) by tellus.hedeland.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04BLRa0W058257 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 May 2020 23:27:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from per@hedeland.org) Subject: Re: How to mount mdf mds in freebsd? To: Jon Radel References: <13534031589224067@vla4-d1c3bcedfacb.qloud-c.yandex.net> <20200511212848.5c3b71be.freebsd@edvax.de> <2c21a31a-6b99-70e7-5c5e-3a4e375b790f@hedeland.org> <59d6e16c-c3bf-2f3f-aa93-d140a3687252@radel.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nikita Stepanov From: Per Hedeland Message-ID: <3bd15b2b-fe1b-7973-8180-42c321174e7f@hedeland.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:27:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59d6e16c-c3bf-2f3f-aa93-d140a3687252@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49LYtl5dGJz4DKT X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of per@hedeland.org has no SPF policy when checking 64.68.202.10) smtp.mailfrom=per@hedeland.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.94 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[209.157.228.81.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.19)[ip: (0.22), ipnet: 64.68.200.0/22(-0.41), asn: 16686(1.20), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[hedeland.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.49)[0.490,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.46)[0.461,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[10.202.68.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16686, ipnet:64.68.200.0/22, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 21:27:44 -0000 On 2020-05-11 22:30, Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/11/20 16:11, Per Hedeland wrote: >> [Polytropon wrote - attribution snipped] >>> PS. >>> >>> Please be so kind and state your question in the message body. >>> Many recipients won't see your empty message because it's being >>> filtered. Thank you! >> +1 (but it will surely be ignored, again). > > Are we sure the OP doesn't have some MUA that believes in HTML *only*--I > believe the list only forwards the plain text variant of the message in > cases of multipart MIME, and I can see unfortunate email being stripped > down to nothing. That is entirely possible (I think it was hinted at in less precise terms in an earlier thread) - but presumably (s)he isn't *forced* to use such a "MUA", and if (s)he actually reads the replies to hir messages, it should be pretty obvious by now that the body of hir messages (if any) never reaches the list, which could reasonably be taken as a hint to try some other means of communication.... > Nikita's headers claim > > X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 > > about which I know nothing useful. Also (first Received: header of the initial message in this thread): Received: by vla4-d1c3bcedfacb.qloud-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2020 22:07:47 +0300 Probably some kind of web interface rather than an actual MUA. --Per