From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Mar 24 23:54:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A99C37B71A; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:54:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Received: from DougBarton.net (Studded@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA40409; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:54:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@DougBarton.net) Message-ID: <3ABDA42F.C5ABB06A@DougBarton.net> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:54:23 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Klemm Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/arts++ Makefile References: <200103171126.f2HBQ7q89753@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andreas Klemm wrote: > > andreas 2001/03/17 03:26:06 PST > > Modified files: > net/arts++ Makefile > Log: > If memory serves me right, ports collection doesn't officially > support RELENG_3. But defining USE_NEWGCC should fix the compile > problems during package building for RELENG_3. > Therefore bump PORTREVISION. I seemed to recall that portrevision was going to be used only for changes that added or subtracted functionality from a port between releases by the software's author(s). It seems to me that actually making the port work isn't really new functionality. Doug -- Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant simply because they are their opinions. Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message