From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 25 12:23:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18645 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:23:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com (mail.camalott.com [208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA18629 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:23:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-85.camalott.com [208.229.74.85]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA02588; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:24:10 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA00955; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:22:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:22:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199808251922.OAA00955@detlev.UUCP> To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org CC: dpk@notreal.com, garbanzo@hooked.net, rabtter@aye.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Robert Watson on Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:11:55 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: I want to break binary compatibility. From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > My favored choice would be to modify the standard dynamic link support to > check /etc/ld.conf (or a sysctl) to determine whether the system policy > currently allowed dynamic linking or not, and if so, whether user-defined > paths were allowed. This, in combination with the bless-support would > work pretty well. Would /etc/ld.conf be vulnerable to chroots? Best, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message