From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 21:17:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2621C16A41F; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MH@kernel32.de) Received: from crivens.unixoid.de (crivens.unixoid.de [81.169.171.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B1B43D46; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MH@kernel32.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crivens.unixoid.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232914196; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:17:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from crivens.unixoid.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (crivens.unixoid.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69269-14; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.144] (G9233.g.pppool.de [80.185.146.51]) by crivens.unixoid.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3764075; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <430E354B.602@kernel32.de> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:16:59 +0200 From: Marian Hettwer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Oppermann References: <430E06AA.2000907@kernel32.de> <430E0A72.1090702@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <430E0A72.1090702@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixoid.de Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem performance with lots of small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:17:07 -0000 Hi Andre, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Marian Hettwer wrote: > >> Besides, I know that 6-BETA is not about performance at all :) >> >> any tips on file system performance with small files, though ? > > > What is low performance for you? Is it creating a new file, opening > an existing file, reading from a file, etc? What is your point of > reference you compare to (FreeBSD 4.11, etc)? > I know that my eMail didn't contain any facts. My point of reference will be FreeBSD 5.4 (shouldn't make a big difference in regards to UFS2, right?) and probably a Gentoo Linux with ext3. Again, my eMail was more about how to tune the performance of UFS2 with tons of small files than a comparison to other release of FreeBSD, or other BSD's (Open, Net) or Linux. I do know that comparing different distributions will be quite hard. That's not the point, yet :) cheers, Marian