Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 10:49:10 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r296387 - head Message-ID: <CANCZdfo-imkuSNhRCWs47fucdOhraNRvk=pJNrLb-A8%2BfOmQSg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56D9BB1D.7040300@FreeBSD.org> References: <201603041603.u24G3F3V033038@repo.freebsd.org> <56D9BB1D.7040300@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 3/4/16 8:03 AM, Ed Maste wrote: > > Author: emaste > > Date: Fri Mar 4 16:03:15 2016 > > New Revision: 296387 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296387 > > > > Log: > > Add dd as a bootstrap tool, for status= support > > > > In r295757 I added status=none to buildworld's use of dd, but FreeBSD > > versions before April 2014 lack support. > > > > Modified: > > head/Makefile.inc1 > > > > Modified: head/Makefile.inc1 > > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/Makefile.inc1 Fri Mar 4 15:30:41 2016 (r296386) > > +++ head/Makefile.inc1 Fri Mar 4 16:03:15 2016 (r296387) > > @@ -1471,6 +1471,11 @@ ${_bt}-usr.sbin/nmtree: ${_bt}-lib/libne > > _cat= bin/cat > > .endif > > > > +# r264059 support for status= > > +.if ${BOOTSTRAPPING} < 1100017 > > +_dd= bin/dd > > +.endif > > + > > # r277259 crunchide: Correct 64-bit section header offset > > # r281674 crunchide: always include both 32- and 64-bit ELF support > > # r285986 crunchen: use STRIPBIN rather than STRIP > > @@ -1546,6 +1551,7 @@ bootstrap-tools: .PHONY > > ${_dtc} \ > > ${_awk} \ > > ${_cat} \ > > + ${_dd} \ > > usr.bin/lorder \ > > ${_libopenbsd} \ > > ${_makewhatis} \ > > > > Thanks! > > It's trivial so worth having. We should discuss what our "oldest > supported upgrade" release should be as currently it is 8.1. > We put it to 8.1 based on Juniper wanted it for their operations. Normally we'd set this closer to 9.0 or something. If Juniper no longer needs it, we should move up to 9.0 since that's typically what we've done in the past at this point in the release cycle. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfo-imkuSNhRCWs47fucdOhraNRvk=pJNrLb-A8%2BfOmQSg>