Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:05:43 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Erik Cameron <ecameron@bsd.uchicago.edu>, Chuck Youse <cyouse@icon.com>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sparc board, and clones Message-ID: <19981118100543.X26432@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <19981118090757.C6935@bsd.uchicago.edu>; from Erik Cameron on Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 09:07:57AM -0600 References: <sa690h9ns4v.fsf@adimus.de> <98111809130300.02392@windsock.flyboy.net> <19981118090757.C6935@bsd.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> One kernel is insufficient if you're not releasing source code. I mean, if
> we're talking about going through and isolating all of the (i386|alpha) code
> out of the kernel and concentrating our rewrites on that, I don't see as how
> (other than more coding) having separate sun4x and sun4u directories in the
> dist would be *that* much trouble.
Before going down this path, I would send a proposal to freebsd-hackers.
If we want the end result merged into the CVS tree, it needs to be
acceptable to the committers. (or at least the loudest ones)
How does {Open,Net}BSD handle this?
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981118100543.X26432>