Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:09:28 +0900 From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> Subject: Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees Message-ID: <TY2PR02MB40139B73AB5759248CD2A915FABC0@TY2PR02MB4013.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <3ea16730-84a1-52ce-2251-bdd808fe5c52@pinyon.org> References: <3ea16730-84a1-52ce-2251-bdd808fe5c52@pinyon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. I am also using poudriere to debug a port that is maintained by me. At that time, there is a file that I want to output to the port tree and collect. In doing so, cover the other directories as follows. They were brought from my ~/.history :) (src-svn is poudriere's option -j src -p svn) rm -r -f -v -- /tmp/ports/ mkdir -v -- /tmp/ports mount -t unionfs -o noatime /tmp/ports /usr/local/poudriere/data/.m/src-svn/ref/usr/ports # Here is a command to output something to the port tree. umount '<above>:/tmp/ports' find -s -- /tmp/ports So, what I'm saying is, why not just use unionfs? :) Best regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?TY2PR02MB40139B73AB5759248CD2A915FABC0>