Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 18:59:24 +0300 From: Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology> To: Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some updates to Wayland stuff Message-ID: <3719ff97-052e-b7b0-3585-acb21a6bb794@unrelenting.technology> In-Reply-To: <CAECmPws4M%2BxuaGbbBHeGpA%2BDaa8g16oKSkGgx=xf-U1eqTS58g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAECmPwvHKnfukzvoZj_in5BGNEB3jJNZOaTYDKJ93WUjNhGRMw@mail.gmail.com> <d85a04cb-cfb5-df96-814f-db1ede592125@unrelenting.technology> <CAECmPws4M%2BxuaGbbBHeGpA%2BDaa8g16oKSkGgx=xf-U1eqTS58g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/09/2017 18:50, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > We should have a common repository for all Wayland stuff. I suggest yours :) Yeah, I'm always open to pull requests. > Maybe now with flavors we can get wayland enabled gtk30 in ports as well? It's enabled in the Gnome team's repo, which I have merged into mine. https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-gnome/tree/gnome-3.26 I don't think flavors are necessary here, Wayland is already getting enabled by default in many ports. Honestly it should be straight up made non-optional, always build Wayland support everywhere by default. > Or maybe we should just switch to ravenports if that's easier to work with? What's ravenports?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3719ff97-052e-b7b0-3585-acb21a6bb794>