From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 23 09:21:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699FB99A2FF for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@searchy.net) Received: from mx.searchy.nl (mx.searchy.nl [IPv6:2a00:1280:8000:4::9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F331D65 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@searchy.net) Received: from mx.searchy.nl (mx.searchy.nl [79.143.214.224]) by mx.searchy.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0415139853; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.searchy.nl X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-99 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mx.searchy.nl (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=searchy.net Received: from mx.searchy.nl ([79.143.214.224]) by mx.searchy.nl (mx.searchy.nl [79.143.214.224]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 50YvatoRG3qN; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2a00:1280:8000:a0::30] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:1280:8000:a0::30]) by mx.searchy.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 995B013984F; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=searchy.net; s=default; t=1458724875; bh=+tE48pwaR73yUseGo/VNYUJx9svmJ1gBF5NCCI8DX0Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JDr4u4RIFHJCamUGCkE8+fdpwEJwXnlhI1VsBOpb21fl5MD+0edQuL8qoWOmMC0sF 1XIDML0J7GLZVT9Jb6d5HvazmC6vkl3ulMd/mPJc3f3zHluB8yG0cKPSHkm9WUpb9q ov/8Z2RT9PCJgeHyT38EBv5TctU0P20D+7hpoQcY= Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! To: Michael Grimm , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <6493A52A-7856-4689-A8CC-5B03F65AEB17@ellael.org> From: Frank de Bot Message-ID: <56F2600B.70208@searchy.net> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:21:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6493A52A-7856-4689-A8CC-5B03F65AEB17@ellael.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:21:20 -0000 I agree it's easy, but I think ports should not have such dependency. The ports system lets you choose the SSL package (or base) you want to build everything with. I think it's going to be problematic if a port decides on it's own to install openssl/libressl whilst you have build everything with a the other SSL package. Michael Grimm wrote: > Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > >> Makefile >> OPTIONS_DEFAULT= RESSL >> >> RESSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libtls.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libressl >> >> >> turn option RESSL to off. > > Ok, thanks, and that was easy ;-) Sorry, I should have found that myself. > > Regards, > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >