From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 05:43:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCF6106566B for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB2F8FC2E for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 3015 invoked by uid 399); 4 Aug 2008 05:43:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 4 Aug 2008 05:43:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4896970E.1080205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:43:42 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Dawson References: <4895E91B.3000002@FreeBSD.org> <200808031923.31775.matt@chronos.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200808031923.31775.matt@chronos.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: BIND -P2 update plans (Was: Re: The BIND scandal) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:43:45 -0000 Matt Dawson wrote: > On Sunday 03 Aug 2008, Doug Barton wrote: >> Hope this helps, > > What actually did help was your most rapid update of the BIND ports to -p2 > yesterday. You managed all of them three hours before I got the SANS > handler's diary on the new releases from RSS! > > Just wanted to say thanks for that. Your work is appreciated. Thank you for the kind words. :) Since this update is performance related rather than directly security related I plan to give people a chance to update from ports and provide feedback before I update the base in HEAD and [67]-stable. So if you run a busy resolving name server, especially if you were having problems with -P1, then please let me know how -P2 works for you. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection