Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:28:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236944] security/strongswan: startup script improvements Message-ID: <bug-236944-7788-wVcEMSTDYE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-236944-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-236944-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236944 Jose Luis Duran <jlduran@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #204703|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #14 from Jose Luis Duran <jlduran@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 208097 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D208097&action= =3Dedit Improve strongswan.in Rebasing 5.8.1 Improving the script to rely more on rc.subr. I have setup an ATF (Kyua-based) with some tests for the rc script (https://github.com/jlduran/strongswan-tests/blob/master/tests/freebsd/rc_s= cript/rc_script), the strongswan.in currently distributed fails some of these tests. The submitted version has a few differences, for instance I am keeping "str= oke" as the default strongswan_interface, while upstream (starting 5.8.0) and in= my GitHub repo "swanctl" (or "vici") is the default. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236944-7788-wVcEMSTDYE>