From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 10 11:29:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0503A16A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2253143D48 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:29:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3AITd7j011096 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:29:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: current@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:29:39 +0200 Message-ID: <11095.1081621779@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Optimizing RCng execution speed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 18:29:42 -0000 Is anybody working on optimizing RCng execution speed ? I think our boottime is getting a bit too slow these days... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.