From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 8 21:55:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-4.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C032237B425 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:55:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED2F366C7A; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:55:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 21:55:32 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joe & Fhe Barbish Cc: "Gary W. Swearingen" , FBSD Questions Subject: Re: Xemacs editor Message-ID: <20020108215532.A78507@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <5gg05g1b9f.05g@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from barbish@a1poweruser.com on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:12:06PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:12:06PM -0500, Joe & Fhe Barbish wrote: > Both the ports and packages install a full blown x11 xemacs environment. > I did a pkg_delete xemacs and it only deleted xemacs and left all > the dependents it used. > Why did the delete not remove all of the dependents used by xemacs? Because they're in a different package (xemacs-packages) Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8O9tUWry0BWjoQKURAl4pAKClEf4UM8+It5cCP5W7SGZ23GCsBACgqwEH Svq5JlckmStahdDnTJEZMYY= =G1pe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message