Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 23:20:28 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> To: "Fernando P. Schapachnik" <fernando@schapachnik.com.ar> Cc: fernando@cursosvirtuales.com.ar, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Debugging kernel Message-ID: <20000309232028.R62624@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200003092225.TAA00381@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar> References: <20000309165255.P62624@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <200003092225.TAA00381@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fernando P. Schapachnik wrote: > No it doesnŽt. It says that make after config -g will produce both kernels. > IŽll send a PR about this as soon as I get it to work. The FAQ *might* be referring to -current; I think there config -g does the right thing. > (kgdb) exec-file kernel.2 > (kgdb) core-file vmcore.2 > kernel symbol `IdlePTD' not found. > (kgdb) where > No stack. > (kgdb) symbol-file kernel.debug > Reading symbols from kernel.debug...done. > (kgdb) where > No stack. I tend to load symbol-file first, despite my advice. If that doesn't help, I don't know. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000309232028.R62624>