From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 11:13:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4029B37B401; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from renaissance.homeip.net (m106.net81-67-12.noos.fr [81.67.12.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1299143F75; Fri, 30 May 2003 11:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anthony.ginepro@laposte.net) Received: by renaissance.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2774222A0; Fri, 30 May 2003 20:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 20:13:13 +0200 From: Anthony Ginepro To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Message-ID: <20030530181313.GA908@renaissance.homeip.net> References: <20030525061524.H30007@sasami.jurai.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030525061524.H30007@sasami.jurai.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Bang Jun-Young cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Preliminary ELF prebinding patches available. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 18:13:08 -0000 > I've implemented per-executable ELF prebinding: > > ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/patches/prebind.patch > > Initial performance measurements are very encouraging. Is it similar to Linux's prelink implementation ? How does it compare with (feature, performance) ?