From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep  7 17:32:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA20991
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA20985;
          Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.5/8.6.6) id RAA00445; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
Message-Id: <199709080031.RAA00445@kithrup.com>
To: jmb@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: spam and the FreeBSD mailing lists
References: <341314D0.E22ADFF3@kew.com> from "Drew Derbyshire" at Sep 7, 97 04:55:44 pm
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In article <199709072335.QAA17881.kithrup.freebsd.hackers@hub.freebsd.org> you write:
>	please remember to distinguish between "mail from:" addresses
>	and relays.  there is *not* reasone that i know of that a
>	"mail from:" address must be resolvable.

Uh, if we can't reply to them, what are we doing allowing them to ask
questions?