Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Dec 2018 20:31:23 +0100
From:      Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Best way to deal with .pyc files?
Message-ID:  <65A6C774-6F62-4385-9DB9-EF0F359CEE4A@grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <f2c1b368-cd2e-85a3-a5c7-794d69204625@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <f2c1b368-cd2e-85a3-a5c7-794d69204625@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 6. Dec 2018, at 19:21, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> The devel/gdb port installs python scripts into /usr/local/share/gdb<ver>/=
python.
> If you then run kgdb as root (not that unusual), it will generate .pyc fil=
es in
> those directories that are not deleted by 'pkg delete'.  What is the best w=
ay to
> handle this case?  Should the pkg-plist include @rmtry entries for each py=
c
> file or is there a better way?

Pre-generate the pyc files on package build and install them with the port, s=
o they become part of plist (there are examples of that in the ports tree, w=
henever possible for both py27 and py3x).

Best,
Michael


> --=20
> John Baldwin
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65A6C774-6F62-4385-9DB9-EF0F359CEE4A>