From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 12 19:44:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E989106566B;
	Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D2D8FC13;
	Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:44:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from g159.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2])
	by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 637223F417;
	Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:36:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:37:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201111090853.pA98rCQ5069069@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1111122031330.3570@gerinyyl.fvgr>
References: <201111090853.pA98rCQ5069069@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:44:08 -0000

On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Martin Wilke wrote:
>   - Make WITH_FBSD10_FIX globally
>   - Add a new flag WITHOUT_FBSD10_FIX for maintainer testing
>   
>   Some additional notes:
>   We are planing to make 10 exp-run after the 9.0 Release within 2 weeks to poke maintainers
>   and upstream as to ensure that for the 10.0 Release, everything is fixed and we can remove
>   the current workaround.

For current ports, actively maintained upstream, it is obviously very 
desirable to get upstream fixed.  However, a surprisingly large portion
of the FreeBSD Ports Collection consists of aged, to avoid the terms
rotten or abandoned ports (on our side and/or upstream) and I do not
think it is worth sinking even more time into those by patching them.

Or are you planning to reinstate WITH_FBSD10_FIX at that point and
mass applying that to all affected ports?

Gerald