From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 30 03:22:51 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA22516 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 03:22:51 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA22496 for ; Tue, 30 May 1995 03:22:45 -0700 Received: from minnow.render.com (render.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.118]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA08231 for ; Tue, 30 May 1995 03:22:46 -0700 Received: (from dfr@localhost) by minnow.render.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id LAA03774; Tue, 30 May 1995 11:06:03 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 11:06:02 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Charles Henrich cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SYSV Shared Mem supported/work ? In-Reply-To: <199505290230.TAA12220@freefall.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 28 May 1995, Charles Henrich wrote: > I seem to recall some discussion a couple weeks ago that SYSVSHM isnt > support/doesnt work. Is this true or am I hallucinating? (The reason I ask is > the new linux lkm requires it.. :) It works well enough for the MIT-SHM X extension. I use it every day and haven't seen any problems with it since I imported it into the 2.0 kernel from NetBSD. -- Doug Rabson, RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 251 4411 FAX: +44 171 251 0939