From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 9 4:34:50 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEE637B400; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 04:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp-ext.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2260143E42; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g79BYcf56444; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:34:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:34:38 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Attila Nagy Cc: Mike Barcroft , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/ftpd ftpd.8 ftpd.c Message-ID: <20020809153438.B55921@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200208081753.g78Hrq0X078614@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020809013552.B94821@espresso.q9media.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bra@fsn.hu on Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:25:05PM +0200 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:25:05PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: > > > Are these changes making it back to lukem to avoid lost functionality > > when we make the switch to lukemftpd? > I think before the switch could happen it is necessary to bring lukemftpd > at least for the same level of performance as the current ftpd. > Two examples: sendfile() support and resource usage. And I think they are > really important... As for me, I'd like to have the old ftpd and lukemftp coexisting for quite a time. It will be not the only case when similar functionality is provided by several stock programs differing in details. -- Yar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message