From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Mar 23 9: 6:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from chupacabras.flash.net (chupacabras.flash.net [209.30.2.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8602737BE15 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 09:06:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@fosburgh.org) Received: from gw.fosburgh.org (p188.amax39.dialup.hou1.flash.net [209.30.72.188]) by chupacabras.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA27700 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:05:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (wotan@localhost) by gw.fosburgh.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24419 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:05:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@ns.fosburgh.org) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 11:05:45 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan E Fosburgh Reply-To: fosburgh@flash.net To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Question regarding make -DNOINFO installworld; make installworld Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Perhaps this belongs on -stable, but I will try here first. I will soon begin upgrading from 3.4-STABLE to 4.0-RELEASE via source. What I wanted to know is if it is necessary to do the second make installworld after the make -DNOINFO installworld. I almost never use info (except on a few ports that have no other decent documentation) and I have been thinking that, if the system is usable after the first installworld, can I just wait until my next make world for the remainder to be installed? If I receive no comments by the end of my buildworld I will go ahead and do both installworlds. Thanks to anyone who comments. Jonathan Fosburgh Jr. UNIX Systems Administrator MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX Home Page: http://www.fosburgh.org Manager, FreeBSD Webring: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html ICQ: 32742908 AIM: Namthorien To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message