From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:08:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC8116A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F10443D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:08:41 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:08:12 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:21 -0000 Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ? I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was a better alternative for performance then 4BSD Thanks At 19:05 2005-11-09, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for > processes in the > > FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler. > >That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the >workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the future. > >Kris >