Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:38:26 +0000 From: "rwatson (Robert Watson)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Updated] D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock details when isn't needed Message-ID: <a6e0095be3e65d85d62255f979abae8c@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
rwatson added a comment. Seems reasonable. I'm slightly surprised that any code other than sbwait() actually implements the sleep on sb_acc, and wonder if either a use of abstraction improvement, or an actual abstraction improvement, is needed to fix t4_ddp.c. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1809 To: davide, kmacy, np, rrs, lstewart, rwatson Cc: julian, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a6e0095be3e65d85d62255f979abae8c>