From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 17 10:49:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421E16A41F for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:49:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0C043D4C for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:49:35 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Alexandre DELAY Message-ID: <0D162CCAE42F819501B87257@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: RE: HDD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:49:45 -0000 +-le 14/12/2005 17:45 +0100, Alexandre DELAY =E9crivait : | Don't you think that flash drives are also a good solution? |=20 | I am sure that it will be the future replacement for hard drive disks. | see http://www.memtech.com/ for example |=20 | With no buffer and 1ms access delay you minimise write failures. It is an | interresting solution. Hum, flash has a *limited* ammount of possible write for each cell, for low cost, it's between 10K-50K and for heavy duty, industrial grade, bla bla bla, it's around 2M, so, hum, just imagine you have a solid state flash disk, and your swap on it. One day, your box begins swapping hard, and some time later, half of your drive can't be written to again... --=20 Mathieu Arnold