From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jul  1 01:17:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA17979
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 01:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA17974
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 01:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA18413;
	Tue, 1 Jul 1997 18:17:16 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 18:17:15 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Holm Tiffe <freebsd@magnet.geophysik.tu-freiberg.de>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: quad ints implemented ?
In-Reply-To: <199707010730.JAA00906@magnet.geophysik.tu-freiberg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970701181651.869J-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 1 Jul 1997, Holm Tiffe wrote:

> I've tried to get postgreSQL V6.1 working with the int8 package on -current.
> It seems that FreeBSD has not jet fully implemented the 64bit int in the
> stdio library, %q is not documented. It works for printf(3), but scanf fails.

Yes, I've noticed this, too.

Danny