From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 27 00:02:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4DF6C2 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x22b.google.com (mail-vb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D553E17C2 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e12so84590vbg.16 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:02:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BIJBxvmoLt1wAPSg+Lyn9HZKBcPJH3aZvmSyyAsHUf0=; b=qkqVB2dzYE7ra2YYZnQ37y82aOvvfy6MVSxkJAXyNpvDwM7jHhkztkt+4ZHhanvLXV Kunj0mGT4pLMJXObkfHo17T36UYe+7VDzyYUxcM3UmQnwpd+s3+51VctW/HCpnPkzzP+ og+QTNFzvzV+Y5IFw8Pu34adLAe45dEwZte3IUTXHM4QoeX025C1zV4qUMfzMczfV8xd IE0upuoL/o9b1tK0a9hNX8A+4F95jwGUbd/MEL0HcPJAdfJI0wSBE9dDghWDl/TdGRGK Du5FI//Lh9oNOuEGUWW5zp1SZ27A/MpYA1nzzLzSfs9/XVDBwMX8FqkJcdmWpgpjdRTo oLug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.97.238 with SMTP id ed14mr2595797veb.34.1372291324459; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.52.200 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:02:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:02:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD From: Jack Vogel To: Super Bisquit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Takuya ASADA , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:02:05 -0000 ethtool is GPL so I wouldn't expect it to show up around here :) Implementing something like it for FreeBSD would be cool however, sometimes sysctl just seems clunky although its usually how i cope with driver things that might be changed via ethtool in Linux. Having to completely rebuild a kernel for controlling RSS seems horribly clunky on the other hand. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Super Bisquit wrote: > If someone ports the ethtool to FreeBSD, it will only work on the > i386/AMD64/ PC98 architectures. > Perhaps having these suggestions as options for the kernel/GENERIC conf > files would be better? > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Because there was an discussion about new APIs to provide better support > > for high performance NICs in Ottawa DevSummit BoF, I wrote a note about > > "How Linux doing it" in that area. > > > > I haven't get a enough chance to talk about it in the summit, but I > decided > > to upload the note on a Wiki. > > > > Here's a link: > > > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/201305DevSummit/NetworkReceivePerformance/ComparingMutiqueueSupportLinuxvsFreeBSD > > > > I hope it helps to decide what kind of interfaces/features do we need on > > FreeBSD. > > > > Takuya ASADA > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >