From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 02:19:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0769516A46C for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PU=5b47fe8d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB67813C4C1 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PU=5b47fe8d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B75D05B8 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:19:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:19:24 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071026031924.38affb9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <472149E5.5070209@sequestered.net> References: <200710232143.14412.freysman@comcast.net> <471EF178.5050600@FreeBSD.org> <4720FD15.4000905@sequestered.net> <47210F08.3060403@FreeBSD.org> <4721349D.9050505@i19.se> <472135A3.2000809@sequestered.net> <20071026022013.06da2474@gumby.homeunix.com.> <472149E5.5070209@sequestered.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 7.0 and 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:19:29 -0000 On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:01 -0700 Jay Chandler wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700 > > Jay Chandler wrote: > > > >> Johan Andersson wrote: > >>> On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend? > >> portupgrade -afO > >> > > > > Personally I prefer > > > > portupgrade -f '<2007-10-25 11:00' > > > > since it's restartable. > > You don't have to throw the -O flag in there to keep various ports > from complaining? The point of -O is to have portupgrade save a few seconds by omitting sanity-checking if pkgdb has already been run. It's not intended for hiding problems.