From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 09:11:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C540C8A558 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [176.9.39.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286C5196E for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.104] (port-212-202-156-99.static.qsc.de [212.202.156.99]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 20D481AAF011; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:10:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date To: Johannes Jost Meixner , freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org References: <201612140911.uBE9BkIB021108@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:42:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:11:01 -0000 On 14.12.2016 12:33, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote: > Given that we've killed rails 3.x we can probably kill the -rails4 port; > they're otherwise identical (not counting pkgnamesuffix). Maybe, maybe not. We should aim to include Rails 5 into the portstree. Therefore this convention could be recycled later. Greetings, Torsten