From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 06:15:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24D137B401 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 06:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from franky.speednet.com.au (franky.speednet.com.au [203.57.65.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B96C43FBD for ; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 06:15:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Received: from hewey.af.speednet.com.au (hewey.af.speednet.com.au [203.38.96.242])h72DF4Ds003006; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:15:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Received: from hewey.af.speednet.com.au (hewey.af.speednet.com.au [172.22.2.1])h72DF4HT041358; Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:15:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andyf@speednet.com.au) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:15:03 +1000 (EST) From: Andy Farkas X-X-Sender: andyf@hewey.af.speednet.com.au To: Wilko Bulte In-Reply-To: <20030802113334.GA96271@freebie.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20030802231356.V41132-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: headsup: swap_pager.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:15:12 -0000 Wilko Bulte wrote: > > If GENERIC has NSWAPDEV=1 then there is no problem, you dont have to fsck > > around with code that has been working for years, and everyone is happy. > > And you point is? There is constant fsck-ing around as you call it with > code that worked for years. If not, we would still be using V6 on PDP.. My point is that the code works fine. Whats wrong with it? -- :{ andyf@speednet.com.au Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/