From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  9 16:27:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1035)
	id 4DF2616A420; Sun,  9 Oct 2005 16:27:47 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:27:47 +0000
From: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>
To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20051009162747.GA51517@hub.freebsd.org>
References: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200510091329.j99DT5Bv001028@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/6.0R schedule.sgml
X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees <cvs-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-doc>,
	<mailto:cvs-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:27:47 -0000

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:29:05PM +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> hrs         2005-10-09 13:29:05 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD doc repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     en/releases/6.0R     schedule.sgml 
>   Log:
>   Document the actual date when RELENG_6_0 branch is created.

Is it time to also bump RELENG_6_0 to 6.0-RC1, and RELENG_6 to 6.0-STABLE
or 6.0-PRERELEASE?  I think that's the traditional practice...