From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 1 19:17:27 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA21667 for current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA21647; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 19:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA04685; Tue, 1 Oct 1996 19:16:11 -0700 (PDT) To: Terry Lambert cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith), bde@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Your UserConfig changes for unmasking PCI devices... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 01 Oct 1996 19:11:48 PDT." <199610020211.TAA03048@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 1996 19:16:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4682.844222570@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Yes, it has, which is why disabling the PCI messages (which would otherwise > encourage fixing things The Right Way 8-)) would be A Bad Thing. PCI probe messages or entries in UserConfig? I can tell you that the latter is just about driving me spare - there's a big difference between conceptual elegance and usability, and the UserConfig of today is far less useful than it was 2 days ago, when I didn't have to skip around all this junk just to set up my ISA cards. Jordan