From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 18:22:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADA516A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:22:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC42E43D31 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:22:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 91970 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Feb 2004 02:22:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:22:49 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Andrey Chernov In-Reply-To: <20040227014940.GA85920@nagual.pp.ru> Message-ID: <20040227181701.G91940@root.org> References: <20040219174334.GA60017@nagual.pp.ru> <20040227001854.GA76036@nagual.pp.ru> <20040227014940.GA85920@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr cc: current@freebsd.org cc: des@des.no Subject: Re: How to deal with deletes between imports (suggestion) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:22:48 -0000 On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:38:03PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > I suggest someone talk to the TRB or cvs@ to get an understanding of our > > preferred methods of dealing with the cvs tree. > > Per your suggestion long time ago I already forward essential mail from > this discussion to cvs@, but still hear nothing from there. Ok, since no one cares enough about this to respond, then it's just a matter of personal preference. > > I raised an objection [... the most important part removed ...] > As I say, if you object, please be constructive. Non-constructive > objections not helps me to do what I need, they just prevent those > actions, which is not acceptable. > > I.e. what to do instead according to your scenario? And in case it is > removing from VENDOR, what to do, say, if some want to see what is in > VENDOR for previous releases (i.e. orphaned vendor files problem). _I_ don't deal with cvs issues nor do I do gnu imports. So you can do whatever you want. I suggested a way that I like but since you like your way, there's no reason to push my way on you if those that do deal with cvs issues or gnu imports don't care. I'll continue doing things my way in the acpica tree and we'll both be happy. The only reason I brought this up is that I thought someone who has to deal with both of us in the overall tree (i.e. cvs@ or trb@) might have an opinion. If that opinion meant I had to change my style, I would. But no opinions so we're both free to do things our own way. Carry on. -Nate